From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Mann

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 9, 2010
CASE NO.: 4:09CR00099-02 BSM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 9, 2010)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 4:09CR00099-02 BSM.

September 9, 2010


ORDER


Defendant Sangeeta Mann's motion for a judgment of acquittal or, in the alternative, for a new trial [Doc. No. 169], is denied.

Sangeeta Mann was charged with conspiracy to obstruct, influence, and impede an official proceeding, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(k) ("count seven"); concealing and attempting to conceal documents and objects with the intent to impair their use in an official proceeding, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(1) and (2) ("count eight"); and knowingly making a false statement to a grand jury while under oath, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1623 ("count nine"). Her case was tried before a jury for five weeks. After hearing the evidence, the jury acquitted Sangeeta Mann on count nine but convicted her on counts seven and eight.

Having reviewed the motion [Doc. No. 169] and the briefs in support [Doc. No. 170] and in opposition [Doc. No. 173], it is hereby determined that Sangeeta Mann's motion should be and hereby is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 9th day of September 2010.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Mann

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Sep 9, 2010
CASE NO.: 4:09CR00099-02 BSM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 9, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Mann

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA PLAINTIFF v. SANGEETA MANN DEFENDANT

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Sep 9, 2010

Citations

CASE NO.: 4:09CR00099-02 BSM (E.D. Ark. Sep. 9, 2010)