U.S. v. Maneses-Flores

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio MANESES-FLORES…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Apr 16, 2003

61 F. App'x 458 (9th Cir. 2003)

Opinion

61 Fed.Appx. 458 (9th Cir. 2003) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio MANESES-FLORES, aka John Doe, Defendant-Appellant. No. 02-50409. D.C. No. CR-01-00827-MMM. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. April 16, 2003

Submitted April 7, 2003. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding.

Before RYMER, KLEINFELD and FISHER, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Antonio Maneses-Flores appeals his guilty-plea conviction and 57-month sentence imposed for illegally reentering the United States following deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. Maneses-Flores's attorney has filed a brief and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Maneses-Flores has not filed a pro se supplemental brief.

Our review of the Anders brief and our independent review of the record under Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), disclose no issues requiring further review. Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED and the district court's judgment is AFFIRMED. ¹

1 All pending motions are denied.