From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Madrigal-Placido

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 854
Oct 22, 2009
334 F. App'x 853 (9th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-30029.

Submitted October 13, 2009.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed October 22, 2009.

Timothy John Racicot, Assistant U.S., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Missoula, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

John Rhodes, Esquire, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Federal Defenders of Montana, Missoula, MT, for Defendants Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana, Donald W. Molloy, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. 9:08-CR-00043-DWM.

Before: B. FLETCHER, LEAVY, and RYMER, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Lucio Madrigal-Placido appeals the district court's order denying in part his motion to suppress. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Madrigal-Placido contends the district court erred by declining to suppress evidence of his identity and his immigration file as the fruit of an unlawful traffic stop. As he acknowledges, this contention is foreclosed. See United States v. Del Toro Gudino, 376 F.3d 997, 1001 (9th Cir. 2004); United States v. Guzman-Bruno, 27 F.3d 420, 421-22 (9th Cir. 1994).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Madrigal-Placido

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 854
Oct 22, 2009
334 F. App'x 853 (9th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Madrigal-Placido

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lucio MADRIGAL-PLACIDO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.Page 854

Date published: Oct 22, 2009

Citations

334 F. App'x 853 (9th Cir. 2009)