Opinion
No. 08-14164.
September 23, 2010
ORDER
This is a student loan case. Defendant Netina Mack has filed a Motion for Request for a Correct Balance [Docket #18], which the Court construes as an objection to a writ of garnishment. At the hearing on this motion held on September 23, 2010, Ms. Mack and counsel for Plaintiff advised the Court that the matter has been resolved, that the remaining balance subject to garnishment is $224.48, and that Ms. Mack's employer has been so informed.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion [Docket #18] is DISMISSED AS MOOT.
SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 23, 2010