From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lewis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 22, 2008
264 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 07-50152.

Submitted January 14, 2008.

The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed January 22, 2008.

Christopher K. Lui, United State Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

James M. Crawford, Esq., Orange, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Christina A. Snyder, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-05-00979-CAS.

Before: HALL, O'SCANNLAIN, and PAEZ, Circuit Judges.



MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Rickey Lewis appeals from his 151-month sentence for bank robbery and attempted bank robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), Lewis's counsel has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, along with a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. We have provided the appellant the opportunity to file a pro se supplemental brief. No pro se supplemental brief or answering brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 82-33, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief on direct appeal.

Accordingly, counsel's motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the sentence is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lewis

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jan 22, 2008
264 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lewis

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Rickey LEWIS, Defendant…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jan 22, 2008

Citations

264 F. App'x 653 (9th Cir. 2008)