From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lee

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Feb 9, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04cv1110-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Feb. 9, 2006)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 2:04cv1110-MEF WO.

February 9, 2006


ORDER ON MOTION


On February 7, 2006, the movant, Alfred Allen Lee, filed a pleading construed by the court to be a motion to expedite ruling. (Doc. # 23.) Upon consideration of this motion, and for good cause, it is

ORDERED that the motion to expedite ruling is DENIED.

While the court is mindful that the petitioner filed his motion in November 2004, and that the requisite pleadings were filed as of March 2005, the court's caseload of actions pending pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 makes it extremely difficult to expedite the resolution of Lee's motion, particularly since the court has adopted a policy of disposing of cases on the basis of the length of pendency. The court assures the parties that a determination of the issues presented in this case will be undertaken in due course.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lee

United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division
Feb 9, 2006
Civil Action No. 2:04cv1110-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Feb. 9, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lee

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ALFRED ALLEN LEE

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Alabama, Northern Division

Date published: Feb 9, 2006

Citations

Civil Action No. 2:04cv1110-MEF WO (M.D. Ala. Feb. 9, 2006)