From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lawrence

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 22, 2008
Crim. Action No. 91-CR-0029 (TFH/AK), Civ. Action No. 06-1387 (TFH/AK) (D.D.C. Dec. 22, 2008)

Opinion

Crim. Action No. 91-CR-0029 (TFH/AK), Civ. Action No. 06-1387 (TFH/AK).

December 22, 2008


ORDER


Upon consideration of the United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation dated January 2, 2008 [Docket No. 9], which recommends that Marcus Lawrence's Petition For A Writ Of Habeas Corpus By A Person In Custody In The District Of Columbia [Docket No. 1] be treated as a successive petition filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255, it hereby is

ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED IN FULL. Accordingly, because the Court lacks jurisdiction to consider the petition, it further is

ORDERED that, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1631 and 2255, the petition be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit for a determination whether to grant Marcus Lawrence leave to file a successive petition for habeas corpus.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lawrence

United States District Court, D. Columbia
Dec 22, 2008
Crim. Action No. 91-CR-0029 (TFH/AK), Civ. Action No. 06-1387 (TFH/AK) (D.D.C. Dec. 22, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lawrence

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARCUS B. LAWRENCE, Defendant. MARCUS B…

Court:United States District Court, D. Columbia

Date published: Dec 22, 2008

Citations

Crim. Action No. 91-CR-0029 (TFH/AK), Civ. Action No. 06-1387 (TFH/AK) (D.D.C. Dec. 22, 2008)