U.S. v. Langdale

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Leland LANGDALE…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 2001

4 F. App'x 501 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

4 Fed.Appx. 501 (9th Cir. 2001) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ronald Leland LANGDALE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 00-50207. D.C. No. CR-99-00757-AHM. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. February 23, 2001

Submitted February 12, 2001. ¹

1 The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a); 9th Cir. R. 34-4.

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, A. Howard Matz, District Judge, Presiding.

Before LEAVY, THOMAS, and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ²

2 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

Ronald Leland Langdale appeals his conviction and 37-month sentence for bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). His attorney has filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no issue for appeal.

Accordingly, we GRANT the motion to withdraw as counsel of record for appellant and the district court's judgment is

AFFIRMED.