From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Lake

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 23, 2009
07-cr-68-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 23, 2009)

Opinion

07-cr-68-bbc.

June 23, 2009


ORDER


In an order entered on May 4, 2009 I denied defendant Dion Lake's motion for a reduction in his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582. On June 2, 2009, defendant filed a notice of appeal. He has not paid the $455 fee for filing his notice of appeal, which is required if he is to take an appeal from the denial of a § 3582 motion. Therefore, I construe defendant's notice as including a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915.

As I explained in the May 25, 2009 order, defendant is not eligible for a sentence reduction because he has already had the benefit of the new sentencing guidelines for crack cocaine. Because defendant wants to raise a legally frivolous argument on appeal, I must certify that his appeal is not taken in good faith.

Pursuant to Fed.R.App.P. 24, defendant has 30 days from the date of this order in which to ask the court of appeals to review this court's denial of leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. His motion must be accompanied by an affidavit as described in the first paragraph of Fed.R.App.P. 24(a) and a copy of this order.

ORDER

IT IS ORDERED that defendant Dion Lake's request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal from this court's order of May 5, 2009 is DENIED. I certify that defendant's appeal is not taken in good faith.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Lake

United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
Jun 23, 2009
07-cr-68-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 23, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Lake

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. DION LAKE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Date published: Jun 23, 2009

Citations

07-cr-68-bbc (W.D. Wis. Jun. 23, 2009)