From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Lachman

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 19, 1987
810 F.2d 916 (9th Cir. 1987)

Opinion

No. 85-1113.

February 19, 1987.

Martin Healy, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiff-appellee.

Chris Cannon, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant-appellant.

Before DOROTHY W. NELSON, WILLIAM C. CANBY, JR. and JOHN T. NOONAN, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The petition for rehearing filed December 8, 1986, is granted. No additional briefing or argument is required. The order filed November 4, 1986, is withdrawn. The order to show cause is discharged.

The suggestion of appropriateness of rehearing en banc filed December 8, 1986, is dismissed as moot.


Summaries of

United States v. Lachman

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 19, 1987
810 F.2d 916 (9th Cir. 1987)
Case details for

United States v. Lachman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. RAM LACHMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 19, 1987

Citations

810 F.2d 916 (9th Cir. 1987)

Citing Cases

Wallace v. Las Vegas Metro. Police Dep't

It is unprofessional conduct to represent inferences as facts. E.g., In re Curl, 803 F.2d 1004, 1006 (9th…

Skycom Corp. v. Telstar Corp.

A lawyer must distinguish a fact from an inference he seeks to press on the court. It is unprofessional…