From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Labuwi

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 14, 2010
382 F. App'x 346 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7722.

Submitted: May 26, 2010.

Decided: June 14, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Wilmington. James C. Fox, Senior District Judge. (7:00-cr-00078-F-8; 7:03-cv-00156-F).

Thomas Walker LaBuwi, II, Appellant Pro Se. Christine Witcover Dean, Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Before NIEMEYER and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.


Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Thomas Walker LaBuwi, II, seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2009) motion. The order is not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2006). A certificate of appealability will not issue absent "a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right." 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2006). When the district court denies relief on the merits, a prisoner satisfies this standard by demonstrating that reasonable jurists would find that the district court's assessment of the constitutional claims is debatable or wrong. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484, 120 S.Ct. 1595, 146 L.Ed.2d 542 (2000); see MillerEl v. CockreU, 537 U.S. 322, 336-38, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). When the district court denies relief on procedural grounds, the prisoner must demonstrate both that the dispositive procedural ruling is debatable, and that the motion states a debatable claim of the denial of a constitutional right. Slack, 529 U.S. at 484-85, 120 S.Ct. 1595. We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that LaBuwi has not made the requisite showing. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Labuwi

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 14, 2010
382 F. App'x 346 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Labuwi

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Thomas Walker LaBUWI, II…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 14, 2010

Citations

382 F. App'x 346 (4th Cir. 2010)