Opinion
2:08-CV-332 JCM (GWF).
December 22, 2010
ORDER
Presently before the court is defendant Kosoko's motion for obtaining suit and shoes in preparation for trial. (Doc. #252). Also before the court is defendant Kosoko's motion in limine (doc. #270), to which the government responded (doc. #279).
On October 8, 2010, the defendant agreed to "withdraw all his outstanding motions except for the motion for prior conviction." (Doc. #274). This agreement applied to the defendant's motion for obtaining suit and shoes in preparation for trial (doc. #252), which the defendant should have subsequently withdrawn. Although the defendant did reserve his right to argue his motion in limine (doc. #270) at trial, referred to as "the motion for prior conviction," the defendant's decision not to testify ultimately rendered this motion moot.
Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that defendant's motion for obtaining suit and shoes in preparation for trial (doc. #252) is DENIED as moot.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that defendant's motion in limine (doc. #270) is DENIED as moot.
DATED December 22, 2010.