Opinion
Case No. 5:05cr16/MCR/MD, 5:07cv14/MCR/MD.
May 16, 2007
ORDER
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND LETTER DATED 5/8/07, was referred to the undersigned with the following deficiencies:
The document is not on 8½-inch × 11-inch paper as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(B)(3).
The first page of the document does not have a bottom margin of at least two inches as required by N.D. Fla. Loc. R. 5.1(B)(3).
For these reasons, IT IS ORDERED that: See Coleman v. Thompson 501 U.S. 722 752 111 S.Ct. 2546 2566 115 L.Ed.2d 640 Pennsylvania v. Finley 481 U.S. 551 554 107 S.Ct. 1990 1993 95 L.Ed.2d 539 Bonin v. Vasquez 999 F.2d 425 429 th
XX The document shall be posted in the electronic file, but no further pleadings will be accepted unless they comply with NORTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA local rules. The submitted hard copy of the document shall be returned by the Clerk without electronic filing. It may be resubmitted after the above noted deficiencies are corrected. XX Other: Defendant's motion for appointm ent of counsel is denied. There is no right to counsel in post-conviction proceedings, including habeas proceedings. , , , , , (1991); , , , , , (1987); , , (9 Cir. 1993). Upon review of the record, the court does not find that appointment of counsel is warranted in this case. DONE and ORDERED.