From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.s. v. Kisto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 2005
134 F. App'x 204 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted June 14, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Mary Beth Pfister, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Phoenix, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael S. Ryan, Esq., Phoenix, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.


Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, Earl H. Carroll, District Judge, Presiding.

Before KLEINFELD, TASHIMA and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Travis Lee Kisto appeals the district court's judgment imposing a 30-month sentence following his guilty-plea conviction for unlawful possession of a firearm in violation of 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861(d) and 5871. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.

We dismiss in light of the valid written appeal waiver. See United States v. Nguyen, 235 F.3d 1179, 1182 (9th Cir.2000) (stating that an appeal waiver is valid when it is entered knowingly and voluntarily); United States v. Cardenas, 405 F.3d 1046, 1048 (9th Cir.2005) (holding that the changes in sentencing law imposed by United States v. Booker, --- U.S. ----, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), did not render waiver of appeal involuntary and unknowing).

DISMISSED.


Summaries of

U.s. v. Kisto

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jun 17, 2005
134 F. App'x 204 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

U.s. v. Kisto

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee, v. Travis Lee KISTO…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jun 17, 2005

Citations

134 F. App'x 204 (9th Cir. 2005)