From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. King

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Oct 7, 2008
CRIMINAL NO. 1:08CR53 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 7, 2008)

Opinion

CRIMINAL NO. 1:08CR53.

October 7, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


On August 22, 2008, Defendant Carl Edward Dodson filed his Motion to Dismiss Count One of the Indictment Due to Duplicity (dkt. no. 42). On September 10, 2008, Defendant Gale A. King also filed a motion to dismiss count one due to duplicity (dkt. no. 59). Then, on September 10, 2008, Defendant Jodi Darlene Dodson filed her motion to join in the pre-trial motions filed by co-defendants (dkt. no. 64).

Magistrate Judge Kaull granted Defendant Jodi Darlene Dodson's motion in his Order/Report and Recommendation/Opinion dated September 11, 2008 (dkt. no. 70).

The Court referred this matter to United States Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull for initial screening and a report and recommendation, which he issued on September 11, 2008 (dkt. no. 70). In his Report and Recommendation, Judge Kaull recommended that the defendants' motions to dismiss count one of the Indictment be denied because count one charges them with "a single conspiracy to commit two or more separate crimes" which is one crime of conspiracy, and, therefore, is not duplicitous. See Braverman v. United States, 317 U.S. 49, 54 (1942).

The Report and Recommendation also specifically warned that failure to object to the recommendation would result in the waiver of appellate rights on this issue. Nevertheless, none of the defendants has filed any objections. The government stated in its response dated September 19, 2008 (dkt. no. 72) that it had no objection.

The defendants' failure to object to the Report and Recommendation not only waives their appellate rights in this matter, but also relieves the Court of any obligation to conduct a de novo review of the issue presented. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 148-153 (1985); Wells v. Shriners Hosp., 109 F.3d 198, 199-200 (4th Cir. 1997).

The Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation and DENIES the defendants' motions to dismiss count one of the Indictment.

It is so ORDERED.

The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this Order to the plaintiff.


Summaries of

U.S. v. King

United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia
Oct 7, 2008
CRIMINAL NO. 1:08CR53 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 7, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. King

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. GALE A. KING, CARL EDWARD DODSON…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Date published: Oct 7, 2008

Citations

CRIMINAL NO. 1:08CR53 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 7, 2008)