From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Khalil

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 23, 2010
09-CR-215 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2010)

Opinion

09-CR-215 (ENV).

June 23, 2010


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


In scheduling a hearing on the motion of pro se Dr. Jeffrey Lucido to quash/modify defendant's subpoena, the Court advised defendant's counsel telephonically that the docket did not reflect any request by defendant for a Fatico hearing. In response, defendant's counsel advised that the subpoena of Dr. Lucido was withdrawn. Accordingly, the motion of Dr. Lucido to quash/modify the subpoena is denied as moot. The Clerk will advise Dr. Lucido by mail.

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Khalil

United States District Court, E.D. New York
Jun 23, 2010
09-CR-215 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Khalil

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. RIAD KHALIL, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. New York

Date published: Jun 23, 2010

Citations

09-CR-215 (ENV) (E.D.N.Y. Jun. 23, 2010)