From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Kelly

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 10, 2007
06-CR-6077L (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2007)

Opinion

06-CR-6077L.

September 10, 2007


DECISION AND ORDER


Defendant, Howard Dennis Kelly ("Kelly"), stands accused of a single-count indictment charging escape from a federal institutional facility. Counsel was appointed to represent Kelly. Pending before the Court are two motions filed by Kelly, pro se, a motion to dismiss (Dkt. #39) and a motion styled pro se motion, Rule 12(b), defective indictment. Since Kelly has counsel, he must not file pro se motions. If he has appointed counsel, that lawyer should represent him and file pleadings and the Court not entertain pro se motions. I have, nevertheless, reviewed the above-referenced motions and find them to be without merit. Therefore, both motions are denied.

CONCLUSION

Defendant's pro se motions to dismiss (Dkt. #39 and Dkt. #42) are in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Kelly

United States District Court, W.D. New York
Sep 10, 2007
06-CR-6077L (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Kelly

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HOWARD DENNIS KELLY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. New York

Date published: Sep 10, 2007

Citations

06-CR-6077L (W.D.N.Y. Sep. 10, 2007)