From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Keeler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 608 (9th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 06-50033.

Submitted February 20, 2007.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).

Filed February 23, 2007.

Becky S. Walker, Esq., Kim I. Meyer, Esq., USLA — Office of the U.S. Attorney Criminal Division, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Michael Tanaka, Esq., FPDCA — Federal Public Defender's Office, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; J. Spencer Letts, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-99-00597-JSL.

Before: BEEZER, FERNANDEZ, and McKEOWN, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


Kelly Keeler appeals from the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing a 24-month sentence. He originally pleaded guilty to possession of stolen mail and possession of 15 or more unauthorized access devices, all in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 1708 and 1029(a)(3).

Pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), counsel for Keeler has filed a brief stating there are no grounds for relief, and a motion to withdraw as counsel of record. No pro se or government brief has been filed.

Our independent review of the record pursuant to Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 83-84, 109 S.Ct. 346, 102 L.Ed.2d 300 (1988), discloses no grounds for relief.

Accordingly, we GRANT counsel's motion to withdraw and AFFIRM the district court's order.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Keeler

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Feb 23, 2007
221 F. App'x 608 (9th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Keeler

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kelly KEELER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Feb 23, 2007

Citations

221 F. App'x 608 (9th Cir. 2007)