From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Kazami

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jun 8, 2009
Case No. 4:09CR166 RWS (E.D. Mo. Jun. 8, 2009)

Summary

In Kazami, 2009 WL 1605895 at *3, for example, counsel for the United States stated at the pretrial hearing on the motion to compel that the subject confidential informant was a witness to the facts to be presented in its case-in-chief and was a person who would be called by the United States as a witness at trial.

Summary of this case from United States v. Caldwell

Opinion

Case No. 4:09CR166 RWS.

June 8, 2009


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendant Raza Kazami [#96] and of defendant Lais Mohammad Noori [#109] for severance of their respective cases for separate trials, the motion of defendant Lais Mohammad Noori to suppress evidence [#81 oral motion], the motion of defendant Noori to dismiss Count 1 as legally insufficient on its face [#108], the motion of defendant Raza Kazami to suppress evidence and statements [#98 and #69 oral motion], and the motion of defendant Raza Kazami for the return of seized property [#54].

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the motions were referred to United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce. Judge Noce held evidentiary hearings on April 21, 2009 and April 29, 2009. Thereafter Judge Noce filed his Reports and Recommendations regarding the defendants' motions on and April 28, 2009 and May 15, 2009. No objections to the Magistrate Judge's recommendations have been filed.

After fully considering the motions and the Report and Recommendations, the Court will adopt and sustain the thorough reasoning of Judge Noce set forth in support of his recommended rulings.

Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge [#120 and #124] are SUSTAINED, ADOPTED, and INCORPORATED herein.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions of defendant Raza Kazami [#96] and of defendant Lais Mohammad Noori [#109] for severance of their respective cases for separate trials is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Lais Mohammad Noori to suppress evidence [#81 oral motion] is denied as moot.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Noori to dismiss Count 1 as legally insufficient on its face [#108] is denied.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Raza Kazami to suppress evidence and statements [#98 and #69 oral motion] are denied as moot because they were withdrawn. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Raza Kazami for the return of seized property [#54] is denied.

IT IS FINALLY ORDERED that this matter remains set for a jury trial on Monday, July 6, 2009 at 9:00 a.m.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Kazami

United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division
Jun 8, 2009
Case No. 4:09CR166 RWS (E.D. Mo. Jun. 8, 2009)

In Kazami, 2009 WL 1605895 at *3, for example, counsel for the United States stated at the pretrial hearing on the motion to compel that the subject confidential informant was a witness to the facts to be presented in its case-in-chief and was a person who would be called by the United States as a witness at trial.

Summary of this case from United States v. Caldwell
Case details for

U.S. v. Kazami

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAZA KAZAMI, and LAIS MOHAMMAD…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Missouri, Eastern Division

Date published: Jun 8, 2009

Citations

Case No. 4:09CR166 RWS (E.D. Mo. Jun. 8, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Caldwell

United States v. DeCoteau, 186 F.3d 1008, 1010 (8th Cir. 1999). See also United States v. Kazami, No.…