Opinion
No. 4:05-CR-662 CEJ.
June 8, 2006
ORDER
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b), the Court referred all pretrial matters in this case to United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce for determination and recommended disposition, where appropriate. On March 28, 2006, Judge Noce issued a Report and Recommendation with respect to the disposition of the motion filed by defendant Charles Johnson to suppress evidence and statements.
Section 636(b)(1) requires a district judge to make a de novo determination of the specified proposed findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge as to which objection is made. In the instant case, Johnson has filed only general, non-specific objections to the Report and Recommendation. He does not point to any specific error in the magistrate judge's factual findings or in his application of the law to the facts. Thus, his objections are insufficient to trigger de novo review by the Court.
Accordingly,IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge David D. Noce is sustained, adopted, and incorporated herein.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motion of defendant Charles Johnson to suppress evidence and statements [Doc. # 17] is denied.