From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
May 26, 2011
CASE NO. 1:CR-94-145-01 (M.D. Pa. May. 26, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO. 1:CR-94-145-01.

May 26, 2011


MEMORANDUM


Before the court is Defendant's motion for relief from judgment filed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) (doc. 325). In an unpublished opinion attached hereto, Robinson v. Sniezek, No. 10-3015 (Third Circuit, Nov. 12, 2010), the appellate court held that "Rule 60(b) cannot be used as an independent means to relieve a defendant of a judgment in a criminal case." Id. at n. 2. If petitioner believes he has cause for relief because of intervening law on an issue previously raised but relief was denied, he should seek permission from the court of appeals to file a second or successive petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. An appropriate order will be issued.

ORDER

In accordance with the accompanying memorandum, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the motion for relief from judgment (doc. 325) is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Johnson

United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
May 26, 2011
CASE NO. 1:CR-94-145-01 (M.D. Pa. May. 26, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. PAUL JOHNSON

Court:United States District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 26, 2011

Citations

CASE NO. 1:CR-94-145-01 (M.D. Pa. May. 26, 2011)