From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Johal

United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Seattle
Feb 7, 2006
Case No. CR 05-334 L (W.D. Wash. Feb. 7, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. CR 05-334 L.

February 7, 2006

John J. Lulejian, Assistant United States Attorney, United States Attorney's Office, Seattle, Washington.


ORDER CONTINUING TRIAL DATE


Following a January 30, 2006, status conference, this Court GRANTS the parties' unopposed requests to continue the trial date.

At the status conference, counsel for Defendants Rajinder Singh Johal, Maninder Singh Khatkar, and Dindyal Sing Jaswal indicated their need for additional time in which to prepare for trial. Their reasons in support of the request for more time included the complexity of the case, the volume of discovery (including approximately 4000 conversations intercepted over a Title III wiretap), and potential novel questions of law or fact, all of which make it unreasonable to expect adequate preparation for pretrial proceedings or for the trial itself within otherwise-applicable time limits. Counsel indicated that proceeding with the original trial dates would result in a miscarriage of justice. All three defendants indicated they knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived their right to a speedy trial by executing written waivers of their rights to a speedy trial through June 1, 2006.

In view of the parties' agreement to continue the trial date, for the reasons stated at the status conference and above, each defendant's knowing, voluntary, and intelligent waiver or anticipated waiver of his right to a speedy trial, and the interest of the public in ensuring the accused adequate, effective, and continued representation by counsel presently assigned, this Court finds that the ends of justice served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

The parties' motion for continuance is GRANTED. Trial is reset for May 8, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. The time from the filing of the stipulated motion through the new trial date shall be excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Sections 3161(h)(8)(A), 3161(h)(B)(i), and 3161(h)(B)(ii).

All pretrial motions shall be filed on or before February 24, 2006.

The government's exhibit and witness lists shall be filed on or before April 24, 2006.

Defendants' exhibit and witness lists shall be filed on or before May 1, 2006.

The government shall provide to Defendants the transcripts that it intends to introduce at trial on or before April 10, 2006. Defendant's objections and transcripts shall be provided to the government on or before April 24, 2006. All parties shall confer and attempt to agree on transcripts on or before May 1, 2006.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Johal

United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Seattle
Feb 7, 2006
Case No. CR 05-334 L (W.D. Wash. Feb. 7, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Johal

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. RAJINDER SINGH JOHAL, MANINDER…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Seattle

Date published: Feb 7, 2006

Citations

Case No. CR 05-334 L (W.D. Wash. Feb. 7, 2006)