From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Jenkins

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jun 22, 2009
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3:99cr21 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 22, 2009)

Opinion

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3:99cr21.

June 22, 2009


ORDER


THIS MATTER is before the Court on the Defendant's handwritten letter addressed to the Clerk of Court which the Court construes as a motion for court-appointed counsel. [Doc. 94].

On June 16, 2009, the undersigned disposed of the Defendant's numerous pending motions, including a motion filed through counsel for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) based on the Crack Cocaine Guideline Amendment, Amendment 706. Since the Defendant had an attorney who filed such a motion for him, the pending motion for court-appointed counsel is moot.

In the letter, the Defendant requested that the Clerk of Court send him a copy of the docket for his criminal case so that he could determine whether his pending motions have been considered by the Court. The Court will refer that request to the Clerk of Clerk but will respectfully request that a copy of the June 16, 2009 Order [Doc. 93] be mailed to the Defendant, if that has not already been done.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the Defendant's motion for court-appointed counsel is hereby DENIED as moot.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Jenkins

United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division
Jun 22, 2009
CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3:99cr21 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 22, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Jenkins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. LUTHER JENKINS, IV

Court:United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division

Date published: Jun 22, 2009

Citations

CRIMINAL CASE NO. 3:99cr21 (W.D.N.C. Jun. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Kincaid

Because the Defendant's sentence was based on the career offender offense level and the resulting sentencing…