Opinion
No. 09-7210.
Submitted: February 25, 2010.
Decided: March 3, 2010.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Martin K. Reidinger, District Judge. (3:99-cr-00021-MR-1).
Luther Jenkins, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Before DUNCAN and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Luther Jenkins, IV, appeals the district court's order denying his motion to modify his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jenkins, No. 3:99-cr-00021-MR-1 (W.D.N.C. June 16, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
The district court's order also denies other motions filed by Jenkins, but Jenkins' informal brief challenged only the denial of the § 3582(c) motion. "The Court will limit its review to the issues raised in the informal brief." 4th Cir. R. 34(b).
AFFIRMED.