From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Jackson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 22, 2010
Crim. No. 08-0221 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 22, 2010)

Opinion

Crim. No. 08-0221.

December 22, 2010


MEMORANDUM ORDER


Defendant, Mark Anthony Jackson, has filed a paper captioned "Petitioner's Motion for Sentence Reduction Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)". In short, Jackson asks the court to reduce his 60 month sentence of incarceration in light of amendments to the Sentencing Guidelines that became retroactively effective on March 1, 2008.

Jackson was sentenced in August of 2009, pursuant to the 2008 edition of the Guidelines Manual, which included those amendments. See U.S.S.G., Amend. 706, 711, 713. Under the amended guidelines, because Jackson stipulated by way of plea agreement to possessing and distributing between 50 and 150 grams of crack cocaine, his base offense level was 30. His base offense level would not change were his sentence calculated under the 2009 edition of the Guidelines Manual. Because Jackson was being sentenced after the directive of Booker was issued, the court considered the section 3553 factors. As a result, the court reduced Jackson's recommended Guidelines sentence of 78 and 97 months incarceration to the mandatory statutory minimum of 60 months incarceration. Jackson's sentence is now final.

The circumstances under which a court may modify a final sentence are limited. 18 U.S.C. § 3582. Jackson contends that his sentence should be reduced pursuant to section 3582(c)(2), because the Sentencing Commission made its crack cocaine amendments retroactive. See U.S.S.G., Amend. 713. Jackson is correct that retroactive amendment of a Sentencing Guideline is grounds for a reduction in sentence. However, Jackson is not entitled to a reduction in this case because he was sentenced in accordance with those amended Guidelines in August of 2009. Moreover, because Jackson pled guilty to 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(iii), which imposes a 60 month mandatory minimum sentence, Jackson's sentence could not be reduced below 60 months.

WHEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 22th day of December, 2010, that Jackson's Petition for Reduction in Sentencing [Doc. No. 53] is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Jackson

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Dec 22, 2010
Crim. No. 08-0221 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 22, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. MARK ANTHONY JACKSON

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Dec 22, 2010

Citations

Crim. No. 08-0221 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 22, 2010)