From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2010
367 F. App'x 411 (4th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-7872.

Submitted: February 18, 2010.

Decided: February 25, 2010.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West

Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:99-cr-00001-JPB-JES-2).

Eugene Lmar Jackson, Appellant pro se. Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Eugene Lmar Jackson appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his petition for a writ of mandamus in which he sought to be resentenced or to have his sentence adjusted so that it ran concurrently with his state sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Jackson, No. 3:99-cr-00001-JPB-JES-2, 2009 WL 3013732 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Jackson

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Feb 25, 2010
367 F. App'x 411 (4th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Jackson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Eugene Lmar JACKSON…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Feb 25, 2010

Citations

367 F. App'x 411 (4th Cir. 2010)