Opinion
No. 08-50023.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed November 24, 2008.
Joel A. Thvedt, Michael J. Raphael, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Errol H. Stambler, Attorney at Law, Los Angeles, CA, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, John F. Walter, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-94-00878-JFW.
Before: WALLACE, LEAVY, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Gregory Island appeals from the district court's order revoking his supervised release and imposing an 18-month sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Island contends that the district court erred by declining to apply the exclusionary rule at his supervised release revocation proceeding. This contention lacks merit. See United States v. Hebert, 201 F.3d 1103, 1104 (9th Cir. 2000) (per curiam); see also United States v. Diaz-Rosas, 13 P.3d 1305, 1307 (9th Cir. 1994) (per curiam).