U.S. v. Horton

Full title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. JEREMY HORTON, Defendant

Court: United States District Court, D. Nebraska

Date published: Jun 30, 2009

4:08CR3005 (D. Neb. Jun. 30, 2009)

Opinion

4:08CR3005.

June 30, 2009

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

RICHARD KOPF, District Judge

This matter is before the court on the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (filing 49) that Defendant's motion to suppress (filing 26) be granted and the objections to the Recommendation (filing 52), filed as allowed by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C).

I have conducted, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), a de novo review of the portions of the Report, Recommendation, and Order to which objections have been made. Inasmuch as Judge Piester has fully, carefully, and correctly applied the law to the facts, I need only state that the Recommendation should be adopted, Plaintiff's objections to the Recommendation should be denied, and Defendant's motion to suppress should be granted.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. The Magistrate Judge's Recommendation (filing 49) is adopted;

2. Plaintiff's objections to the Recommendation (filing 52) are denied; and

3. Defendant's motion to suppress (filing 26) is granted.