From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Holt

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Mar 1, 2011
CASE NO.: 4:05cr46-SPM-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2011)

Opinion

CASE NO.: 4:05cr46-SPM-GRJ.

March 1, 2011


ORDER


THIS CAUSE comes before the Court on the magistrate judge's report and recommendation dated February 8, 2011 (doc. 164). Defendant has been furnished a copy of the report and recommendation and has been afforded an extension of time to file objections pursuant to Title 28, United States Code, Section 636(b)(1). Defendant has filed objections (doc. 165). Having considered the report and recommendation, and the objection, I have determined that the report and recommendation should be adopted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED as follows:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (doc. 164) is ADOPTED and incorporated by reference in this order.

2. Defendant's § 2255 motion to vacate (doc. 137), as amended (see doc. 163), is denied.

3. No certificate of appealability will be issued because Defendant has failed to make a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.

DONE AND ORDERED this 1st day of March, 2011.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Holt

United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division
Mar 1, 2011
CASE NO.: 4:05cr46-SPM-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Holt

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY CAMERON HOLT, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Tallahassee Division

Date published: Mar 1, 2011

Citations

CASE NO.: 4:05cr46-SPM-GRJ (N.D. Fla. Mar. 1, 2011)