From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Holmes

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Jan 16, 2009
No. 3:08-cr-129, (Phillips/Guyton) (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2009)

Opinion

No. 3:08-cr-129, (Phillips/Guyton).

January 16, 2009


ORDER


On December 22, 2008, the Honorable H. Bruce Guyton, United States Magistrate Judge, entered a twenty-one page Report and Recommendation ("R R") [Doc. 22], in which he recommended that defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 12] be denied. Pursuant to Rules 59(b)(2) and 45 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, the deadline for timely objections has passed, with no such objections filed by either party.

After a careful review of the record, the court finds itself in complete agreement with Judge Guyton's thorough analysis of defendant's motion. Accordingly, the R R is ACCEPTED IN WHOLE, which the court adopts and incorporates into this order, whereby defendant's Motion to Suppress Evidence [Doc. 12] is DENIED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Holmes

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville
Jan 16, 2009
No. 3:08-cr-129, (Phillips/Guyton) (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Holmes

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. ADAM HOLMES, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, at Knoxville

Date published: Jan 16, 2009

Citations

No. 3:08-cr-129, (Phillips/Guyton) (E.D. Tenn. Jan. 16, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Ramos

cation and license check, since "[t]h[o]se actions were directed at Diaz-Castaneda himself, rather than Diaz…