From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hollins

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Oct 20, 2008
No. CR 92-00126 SBA [Docket No. 209] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)

Opinion

No. CR 92-00126 SBA [Docket No. 209].

October 20, 2008


ORDER


Before the Court is defendant's Rule 35 Motion, Section (B) Reduce, Vacate, or Set Aside (the "Motion") [Docket No. 209]. Defendant is in custody and seeks release from the United States Bureau of Prisons allegedly to assist federal and local law enforcement officials as a confidential informant. Defendant seeks release under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35(b). This subdivision only provides for a reduction in sentence on motion made by the government, after sentencing, requesting such a reduction, for substantial assistance provided by a defendant to the government, post-sentencing. Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b)(1)-(2). The government has not made such a motion, nor is it clear defendant has of yet provided any assistance to any law enforcement officials. The Court thus DENIES the Motion without prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hollins

United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division
Oct 20, 2008
No. CR 92-00126 SBA [Docket No. 209] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hollins

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL P. HOLLINS, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, Oakland Division

Date published: Oct 20, 2008

Citations

No. CR 92-00126 SBA [Docket No. 209] (N.D. Cal. Oct. 20, 2008)