Opinion
No. 11-6484.
Submitted: June 21, 2011.
Decided: July 26, 2011.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge (5:93-cr-00144-BO-3).
Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Stanley Hickman appeals the district court's order denying his "Motion Nunc Pro Tunc for Review of Sentence." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.United States v. Hickman, No. 5:93-cr-00144-BO-3 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED