From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hickman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 26, 2011
440 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-6484.

Submitted: June 21, 2011.

Decided: July 26, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge (5:93-cr-00144-BO-3).

Before NIEMEYER and GREGORY, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Stanley Hickman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.


Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Stanley Hickman appeals the district court's order denying his "Motion Nunc Pro Tunc for Review of Sentence." We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.United States v. Hickman, No. 5:93-cr-00144-BO-3 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 25, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hickman

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jul 26, 2011
440 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hickman

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. STANLEY HICKMAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jul 26, 2011

Citations

440 F. App'x 228 (4th Cir. 2011)