Opinion
No. 07-10115.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
Filed November 26, 2007.
Mary Sue Feldmeier, Esq., Office of the U.S. Attorney, Tucson, AZ, for Plaintiff-Appellee.
Christopher R. Kilburn, Esq., Federal Public Defender's Office, Tucson, AZ, for Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona, David C. Bury, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-01044-DCB.
Before: TROTT, W. FLETCHER, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Marco Antonio Hernandez-Romero appeals from the 51-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for illegal re-entry after deportation, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and enhanced by (b)(2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
Hernandez-Romero contends that the district court failed to conduct a proper 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) analysis. We disagree. See Rita v. United States, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2469, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007); see also United States v. Perez-Perez, No. 06-30341, 2007 WL 3052985 at *1-2 (9th Cir. Oct.22, 2007).