From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hernandez-Perez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 18, 2010
366 F. App'x 531 (5th Cir. 2010)

Summary

affirming § 2L1.1(b) enhancement when defendant transported fifteen passengers in a vehicle rated to carry seven passengers and thirteen of the passengers lacked safety restraints and were lying on top of each other

Summary of this case from United States v. Munoz

Opinion

No. 09-10538. Summary Calendar.

February 18, 2010.

Denise B. Williams, U.S. Attorney's Office, Lubbock, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Jason Douglas Hawkins, Federal Public Defender's Office, Dallas, TX, David E. Sloan, Federal Public Defender's Office, Lubbock, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 1:08-CR-72-1.

Before JOLLY, WIENER, and ELROD, Circuit Judges.


Defendant-Appellant Ernesto Hernandez-Perez appeals his 24-month sentence for transporting illegal aliens for financial gain. The district court enhanced the sentence pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(6) after it determined that Hernandez-Perez intentionally or recklessly created a substantial risk of death or serious bodily injury to the aliens he transported. Hernandez-Perez contends that the circumstances of his offense do not warrant the sentence enhancement.

We review a district court's interpretation of the Guidelines de novo and reviews its factual findings for clear error. See United States v. Solis-Garcia, 420 F.3d 511, 514 (5th Cir. 2005). It is undisputed that Hernandez-Perez transported fifteen persons in a vehicle rated to carry seven passengers and that thirteen of his passengers lacked safety restraints and were "lying on top of each other" in the vehicle's rear compartment. As the commentary to § 2L1.1 gives "carrying substantially more passengers than the rated capacity of a motor vehicle or vessel" as an example of reckless conduct that would support a sentence enhancement under that Guideline, we perceive no error in Hernandez-Perez's sentence. See § 2L1.1, comment. (n. 5).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hernandez-Perez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 18, 2010
366 F. App'x 531 (5th Cir. 2010)

affirming § 2L1.1(b) enhancement when defendant transported fifteen passengers in a vehicle rated to carry seven passengers and thirteen of the passengers lacked safety restraints and were lying on top of each other

Summary of this case from United States v. Munoz

affirming where a vehicle rated for seven was carrying 15 passengers

Summary of this case from United States v. Castelo-Palma

applying comment 5 to a defendant who had transported fifteen people in a vehicle rated to carry seven

Summary of this case from U.S. v. Rodriguez
Case details for

U.S. v. Hernandez-Perez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Ernesto HERNANDEZ-PEREZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 18, 2010

Citations

366 F. App'x 531 (5th Cir. 2010)

Citing Cases

U.S. v. Rodriguez

A Ford Explorer is rated to carry five people, while Rodriguez's Explorer was carrying six. We do not read…

United States v. Munoz

; United States v. Cardona-Lopez, 602 Fed.Appx. 191, 191-92 (5th Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (unpublished)…