U.S. v. Hernandez-Holguin

Full title: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon HERNANDEZ-HOLGUIN…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Mar 14, 1997

108 F.3d 1387 (9th Cir. 1997)

Opinion

108 F.3d 1387 (9th Cir. 1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ramon HERNANDEZ-HOLGUIN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 9-50464. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit March 14, 1997

Submitted March 11, 1997. ^*

* The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); 9th Cir.R. 34-4.

Editorial Note:

This opinion appears in the Federal reporter in a table titled "Table of Decisions Without Reported Opinions". (See FI CTA9 Rule 36-3 regarding use of unpublished opinions)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, No. CR-96-00287-ER; Edward Rafeedie, District Judge, Presiding.

C.D.Cal.

AFFIRMED.

Before: SNEED, LEAVY and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by 9th Cir.R. 36-3.

Ramon Hernandez-Holguin appeals his conviction by conditional guilty plea and the sentence imposed for illegal reentry by a previously departed aggravated felon in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, contending he was entitled to national discovery regarding prosecution of illegal reentry cases. We affirm the district court because this contention is foreclosed by our recent opinion in United States v. Candia-Veleta, 104 F.3d 243 (9th Cir.1996).

AFFIRMED.