From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hernandez

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 8, 2008
Criminal Case No. 07-cr-00402-LTB (D. Colo. Feb. 8, 2008)

Opinion

Criminal Case No. 07-cr-00402-LTB.

February 8, 2008


ORDER


As further set forth on the record at the hearing held on February 8, 2008, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows:

1. Defendant's Request for Notice of Intent to Use Evidence Per to Rule 12(b)(4)(B) [Doc #47]; Motion for Disclosure of 404(b) Evidence [Doc #48]; Motion for Release of Brady Materials [Doc #49]; Motion for Production of Bruton and Rule 801(d)(2)(E) Materials and Motion for Pretrial Determination of Admissibility of Alleged Co-Conspirator Statements [Doc #50]; Motion for Discovery [Doc #51]; Motion Request for Notice of Intent to Call Expert Witnesses and Discovery Pursuant to Rule 16(a)(1)(D) and (E) [Doc #52]; and Motion to Preserve Recordings and Notes [Doc #53] are DENIED AS MOOT.

2. Defendant's Motion for Discovery Pertaining to Intercepted Communications [Doc #56] is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART.

3. The Government shall provide Defendant with all wiretap applications and renewal applications relating to CS-1 as the interceptee and all intercepted communications relating to CS-1.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hernandez

United States District Court, D. Colorado
Feb 8, 2008
Criminal Case No. 07-cr-00402-LTB (D. Colo. Feb. 8, 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. 1. ARMANDO HERNANDEZ, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Colorado

Date published: Feb 8, 2008

Citations

Criminal Case No. 07-cr-00402-LTB (D. Colo. Feb. 8, 2008)