From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 22, 2010
383 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2010)

Opinion

No. 09-10334 Conference Calendar.

June 22, 2010.

Susan B. Cowger, U.S. Attorney's Office, Dallas, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Denver Gray McCarty, Denton, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, USDC No. 3:06-CR-192-7.

Before JOLLY, STEWART, and OWEN, Circuit Judges.


The attorney appointed to represent Victor Ruiz Hernandez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hernandez has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Hernandez's claim of ineffective assistance of counsel; such a claim generally "cannot be resolved on direct appeal when the claim has not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations." United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Hernandez's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.

Hernandez's motion for appointment of substitute counsel is DENIED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 22, 2010
383 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Victor Ruiz HERNANDEZ…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 22, 2010

Citations

383 F. App'x 433 (5th Cir. 2010)