From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 30, 2007
238 F. App'x 972 (4th Cir. 2007)

Opinion

No. 07-7041.

Submitted: August 23, 2007.

Decided: August 30, 2007.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:91-cr-00139-CMH).

Alejandro DeJesus Hernandez, Appellant Pro Se. Bernard James Apperson, III, Office of the United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Before WILLIAMS, Chief Judge, and WILKINS and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judges.


Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Alejandro DeJesus Hernandez appeals a district court order denying us untimely his Rule 60(b) motion seeking reconsideration of the 1997 denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. We affirm because the district court was without jurisdiction to consider the motion because Hernandez had not received authorization from this court. See 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (2000). To the extent Hernandez seeks authorization, we deny the request. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hernandez

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 30, 2007
238 F. App'x 972 (4th Cir. 2007)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hernandez

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff — Appellee, v. Alejandro DeJesus…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 30, 2007

Citations

238 F. App'x 972 (4th Cir. 2007)

Citing Cases

Hernandez v. United States

Alejandro DeJesus HERNANDEZ, petitioner, v. UNITED STATES.Case below, 238 Fed.Appx. 972. Petition for writ of…