Opinion
CRIMINAL NO: 08-19, SECTION: R(5).
January 22, 2009
ORDER
Before the Court is defendant Michael Henry's Second Motion for Recusal. "Both recusal statutes require a `proceeding' pending before the Judge sought to be recused." United States v. Bowens, 291 Fed. Appx. 644, 645 (5th Cir. 2008) (per curiam) ( citing 28 U.S.C. §§ 144, 455). "The term `proceeding' implies `the judge's participation in decisions affecting the substantive rights of the litigants to an actual case or controversy." Id. ( quoting United States v. Sciarra, 851 F.2d 621, 635 (3d. Cir. 1988). This case is closed. The only motion left to recuse from is Henry's own, and the Court lacks jurisdiction to hear it. Henry's Motion is therefore DISMISSED.