From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Henderson

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester
Sep 9, 2010
Case No. 4:03-CR-12-001 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Case No. 4:03-CR-12-001.

September 9, 2010.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


The defendant appeared for a hearing before the undersigned on September 9, 2010, in accordance with Rule 32.1 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure on the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision of U.S. Probation Officer Doug Corn and the Warrant for Arrest issued by Chief U.S. District Judge R. Allan Edgar. Those present for the hearing included:

(1) AUSA Terra Bay for the USA.
(2) Defendant TIMOTHY HENDERSON.
(3) Attorney Anthony Martinez with Federal Defender Services of Eastern Tennessee for defendant.
(4) Deputy Clerk Barbara Lewis.

After being sworn in due form of law the defendant was informed or reminded of his privilege against self-incrimination accorded him under the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

It was determined the defendant wished to be represented by an attorney and he qualified for the appointment of an attorney to represent him at government expense. Attorney Martinez was appointed to represent the defendant. It was determined the defendant had been provided with a copy of the Petition for Warrant for Offender Under Supervision and the Warrant for Arrest and had the opportunity of reviewing those documents with his attorney. It was also determined the defendant was capable of being able to read and understand the copy of the aforesaid documents he had been provided.

Defendant waived his right to a preliminary hearing and detention hearing.

AUSA Bay moved defendant be detained pending a hearing to determine whether his term of supervision should be revoked.

Findings

(1) Based upon U.S. Probation Officer Corn's petition and defendant's waiver of preliminary hearing and detention hearing, the undersigned finds there is probable cause to believe defendant has committed violations of his conditions of supervised release as alleged in the petition.

Conclusions

It is ORDERED:

(1) The defendant shall appear in a revocation hearing before Chief U.S. District Judge Curtis L. Collier.
(2) The motion of AUSA Bay that defendant be DETAINED WITHOUT BAIL pending his revocation hearing before Judge Collier is GRANTED.
(3) The U.S. Marshal shall transport defendant to a revocation hearing before Judge Collier on Judge Collier on October 14, 2010 at 9:00 a.m. [EASTERN].


Summaries of

U.S. v. Henderson

United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester
Sep 9, 2010
Case No. 4:03-CR-12-001 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 9, 2010)
Case details for

U.S. v. Henderson

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. TIMOTHY HENDERSON, EDGAR/CARTER

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Tennessee, Winchester

Date published: Sep 9, 2010

Citations

Case No. 4:03-CR-12-001 (E.D. Tenn. Sep. 9, 2010)