Opinion
2:05-cr-240-GEB.
February 2, 2006
ORDER
On January 30, 2006, Defendant Hamid Hayat filed an amended motion to dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Second Superseding Indictment, arguing these Counts are multiplicitous of Count One because they are based on identical violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. On February 2, 2006, the government filed an opposition arguing the Court should defer adjudication of the motion until the record is developed at trial.
Ruling on the motion is deferred until after a sufficient trial record is developed.