From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

United States v. Hayat

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2006
2:05-cr-240-GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2006)

Opinion

2:05-cr-240-GEB.

February 2, 2006


ORDER


On January 30, 2006, Defendant Hamid Hayat filed an amended motion to dismiss Counts Two and Three of the Second Superseding Indictment, arguing these Counts are multiplicitous of Count One because they are based on identical violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1001. On February 2, 2006, the government filed an opposition arguing the Court should defer adjudication of the motion until the record is developed at trial.

Ruling on the motion is deferred until after a sufficient trial record is developed.


Summaries of

United States v. Hayat

United States District Court, E.D. California
Feb 2, 2006
2:05-cr-240-GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2006)
Case details for

United States v. Hayat

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. HAMID HAYAT, and UMER HAYAT…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Feb 2, 2006

Citations

2:05-cr-240-GEB (E.D. Cal. Feb. 2, 2006)