From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hawk

United States District Court, D. Montana, Division
Aug 30, 2011
CR 11-33-M-DWM-1 (D. Mont. Aug. 30, 2011)

Opinion

CR 11-33-M-DWM-1.

August 30, 2011


ORDER


United States Magistrate Judge Jeremiah C. Lynch entered Findings and Recommendation in this matter on August 9, 2011. Neither party objected and therefore they are not entitled to de novo review of the record. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). This Court will review the Findings and Recommendation for clear error.McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Commodore Bus. Mach., Inc., 656 F.2d 1309, 1313 (9th Cir. 1981). Clear error exists if the Court is left with a "definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed." United States v. Syrax, 235 F.3d 422, 427 (9th Cir. 2000).

Judge Lynch recommended this Court accept Pamela Sue Hawk's guilty plea after Hawk appeared before him pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 11, and entered her plea of guilty to one count of making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1001(a)(1), as set forth in the Indictment filed against her.

I find no clear error in Judge Lynch's Findings and Recommendation (dkt # 31), and I adopt them in full, including the recommendation to defer acceptance of the Plea Agreement until sentencing when the Court will have reviewed the Plea Agreement and Presentence Investigation Report.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Pamela Sue Hawk's motion to change plea (dkt #19) is GRANTED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hawk

United States District Court, D. Montana, Division
Aug 30, 2011
CR 11-33-M-DWM-1 (D. Mont. Aug. 30, 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hawk

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. PAMELA SUE HAWK, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Montana, Division

Date published: Aug 30, 2011

Citations

CR 11-33-M-DWM-1 (D. Mont. Aug. 30, 2011)