From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Harris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Feb 11, 2009
4:06-CR-00255-WRW (E.D. Ark. Feb. 11, 2009)

Opinion

4:06-CR-00255-WRW.

February 11, 2009


ORDER


Pending is Contemnor Julian Allmon's Motion to Dismiss for lack of probable cause. The Prosecution has responded.

Doc. No. 94.

Doc. No. 95.

On February 27, 2008, the Prosecution called Julian Allmon ("Allmon") as a witness, to testify regarding Anthony Harris's and Brandon Reed's alleged involvement in the attempted murder of Turna Grigsby. Rather than repeating the testimony he gave in the United States v. Derek Allmon trial, Julian Allmon refused to testify at all.

In that trial, Julian Allmon testified that Derek Allmon ordered and that Anthony Harris and Brandon Reed were involved in the conspiracy and attempted murder of Turna Grigsby.

Allmon's refusal to testify apparently rested on what might happen when other inmates found out he testified for the government. Additionally, Allmon's counsel argued that the Fifth Amendment claims may arise if Allmon's testimony were to change out of fear of reprisal from other inmates; such fear does not permit a refusal to testify. While on the stand, Allmon asserted that he did not want to testify and was willing to forgo a downward departure for cooperation, because he did not want to testify against his cousins (Reed and Harris). Allmon also suggested that he would answer questions by his cousins' lawyers, just not the Prosecution. I directed Allmon to testify, and he refused.

See LaTona v. U.S., 449 F.2d 121, 122 (8th Cir. 1971) (holding that fear of reprisal does not excuse a witness from testifying). See also U.S. v. Madrigal, 171 F.3d 1188, 1189 (8th Cir. 1999) (holding that "fear of reprisal is not a defense in a criminal contemp proceeding.").

As I ruled at the trial, and after again reviewing the testimony and briefs, I do not believe Allmon had a Fifth Amendment right (or any other right) to refuse to testify when compelled to do so by the Court. Accordingly, Allmon's Motion to Dismiss for lack of probable cause (Doc. No. 94) is DENIED.

Allmon entered into a plea agreement with the Prosecution that reads: "The defendant further understands that by entering into this Agreement, he is waiving certain constitutional rights, including . . . the right to remain silent and not be compelled to testify, and to have that choice not used against the defendant." Allmon also agreed to "fully cooperate with the United States . . . [and] To testify before any grand and/or petit jury as a witness for the United States when deemed appropriate by the United States. See, March 20, 2006 Plea Agreement.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Harris

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division
Feb 11, 2009
4:06-CR-00255-WRW (E.D. Ark. Feb. 11, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Harris

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. ANTHONY HARRIS and BRANDON REED JULIAN ALLMON…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Western Division

Date published: Feb 11, 2009

Citations

4:06-CR-00255-WRW (E.D. Ark. Feb. 11, 2009)