Opinion
7:00-CR-12 (WDO).
June 13, 2007
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Harned's THIRD motion to "correct" the written judgment regarding income earned while he is in prison. As explained in the previous orders, because Harned is requesting the Court to modify the Judgment in a way that is a substantive change and not a clerical change, his original motions were not properly brought pursuant to Rule 36 and the latest motion is therefore DENIED.