From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Harding

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Apr 23, 2003
No. 2:03CR 0262 DKW (D. Utah Apr. 23, 2003)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

In Floyd v. Harding, 28 Gratt. 401, after a careful examination into the objects and scope of our registry acts, and review of all the authorities, it was settled that said acts have no application to parol contracts for land.

Summary of this case from Powell v. Bell's Adm'r
See 1 Summary

Opinion

No. 2:03CR 0262 DKW

April 23, 2003

PAUL A. WARNER, United States Attorney (#3389) MICHELE M. CHRISTIANSEN, Assistant United States Attorney (#7259) Salt Lake City, Utah, Attorneys for the United States of America.

ORDER UNSEALING INDICTMENT

DAVID K. WINDER, United States District Judge

Based upon oral motion made in open court on April 17, 2003 by the United States, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Indictment in the above matter be unsealed.

Summaries of

U.S. v. Harding

United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division
Apr 23, 2003
No. 2:03CR 0262 DKW (D. Utah Apr. 23, 2003)

In Floyd v. Harding, 28 Gratt. 401, after a careful examination into the objects and scope of our registry acts, and review of all the authorities, it was settled that said acts have no application to parol contracts for land.

Summary of this case from Powell v. Bell's Adm'r
Case details for

U.S. v. Harding

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. FLOYD JAMES HARDING, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, D. Utah, Central Division

Date published: Apr 23, 2003

Citations

No. 2:03CR 0262 DKW (D. Utah Apr. 23, 2003)

Citing Cases

Powell v. Bell's Adm'r

In Floyd v. Harding, 28 Gratt. 401, after a careful examination into the objects and scope of our registry…

Eidson v. Huff

It is proper to add that since this case was argued in Staunton, the case of Floyd v. Harding, 28 Gratt.…

4 Citing Cases