From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Handshoe

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division Pikeville
Jan 29, 2009
Criminal Action No. 08-32-ART (E.D. Ky. Jan. 29, 2009)

Opinion

Criminal Action No. 08-32-ART.

January 29, 2009


ORDER


Pending before the Court is the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation regarding Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, R. 15. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b)(3) requires district courts to review any portion of the order to which a party objects. Defendant has not filed any objections to the Magistrate's Report and Recommendation, and the time for filing any objections has expired. See FED. R. CIV. PROC. 72(b). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, R. 15, is ADOPTED in full.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Handshoe

United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division Pikeville
Jan 29, 2009
Criminal Action No. 08-32-ART (E.D. Ky. Jan. 29, 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Handshoe

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. LEROY HANDSHOE, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Kentucky, Southern Division Pikeville

Date published: Jan 29, 2009

Citations

Criminal Action No. 08-32-ART (E.D. Ky. Jan. 29, 2009)

Citing Cases

United States v. Wand

Here, even if Wand believed that his statements at the MDP discussion were made pursuant to the disclaimer on…