From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hampton

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 6, 2006
Case No. 1:05:CR:166 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 6, 2006)

Opinion

Case No. 1:05:CR:166.

February 6, 2006


ORDER


The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation filed by the United States Magistrate Judge in this action. The Report and Recommendation was duly served on the parties, and no objection has been made thereto within the time required by law.

THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that:

1. The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge filed January 23, 2006, is approved and adopted as the Opinion and Findings of this Court.

2. Defendant Poohpa C. Hampton's plea of guilty to Count Three of the Indictment is accepted. Defendant Poohpa C. Hampton is adjudicated guilty.

3. Defendant Poohpa C. Hampton shall be detained pending sentencing.

4. A decision of whether to accept the written plea agreement will be made at the time of sentencing after the Court has had the opportunity to review the Presentence Investigation Report. See U.S.S.G. Ch. 6.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hampton

United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Feb 6, 2006
Case No. 1:05:CR:166 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 6, 2006)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hampton

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff, v. POOHPA C. HAMPTON, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Feb 6, 2006

Citations

Case No. 1:05:CR:166 (W.D. Mich. Feb. 6, 2006)