From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Halvorsen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
302 F. App'x 559 (9th Cir. 2008)

Opinion

No. 08-30028.

Argued and Submitted November 18, 2008.

Filed December 1, 2008.

Edward Eric Zink, Esquire, Special Assistant U.S., USBI-Office of the U.S. Attorney, Billings, MT, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

David Merchant, Assistant Federal Public Defender, FDMT-Federal Defenders of I Montana, Billings, MT, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; Jack D. Shanstrom, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CR-06-00138-JDS.

Before: KOZINSKI, Chief Judge, B. FLETCHER and RAWLINSON, Circuit Judges.


MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.


On de novo review, we conclude that the probation officers had reasonable suspicion to conduct the search, which was all that Halvorsen's probation conditions required. The district court properly denied Halvorsen's motion to suppress. See United States v. Knights, 534 U.S. 112, 121, 122 S.Ct. 587, 151 L.Ed.2d 497 (2001); United States v. Stokes, 292 F.3d 964, 967 (9th Cir. 2002).

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Halvorsen

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Dec 1, 2008
302 F. App'x 559 (9th Cir. 2008)
Case details for

U.S. v. Halvorsen

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Bradford HALVORSEN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Dec 1, 2008

Citations

302 F. App'x 559 (9th Cir. 2008)