From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Haley

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 20, 2009
348 F. App'x 996 (5th Cir. 2009)

Opinion

No. 09-40093 Conference Calendar.

October 20, 2009.

Heather Harris Rattan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney's Office, Piano, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee.

Kimberly S. Keller, The Keller Law Firm, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, USDC No. 4:07-CR-247-2.

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.


The attorney appointed to represent Noah Haley has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Haley has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Haley's claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally "cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations." United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel's brief, and Haley's response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R. 42.2.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Haley

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Oct 20, 2009
348 F. App'x 996 (5th Cir. 2009)
Case details for

U.S. v. Haley

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Noah HALEY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Oct 20, 2009

Citations

348 F. App'x 996 (5th Cir. 2009)

Citing Cases

Freeney v. United States

Most of the issues set forth in the first claim are issues of ineffective assistance of counsel, and the…