From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

U.S. v. Hairston

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 20, 2011
408 F. App'x 659 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 10-7310.

Submitted: January 13, 2011.

Decided: January 20, 2011.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Martinsburg. John Preston Bailey, Chief District Judge. (3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1).

Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., Appellant Pro Se. Paul Thomas Camilletti, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Before MOTZ, KING, and WYNN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.


Arthur Lee Hairston, Sr., appeals the district court's order adopting the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion to modify his sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hairston, No. 3:00-cr-00024-JPB-JES-1, 2010 WL 3521591 (N.D.W.Va. Sept. 3, 2010). We deny Hairston's "Motion for the Court to Issue an Order." We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

U.S. v. Hairston

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jan 20, 2011
408 F. App'x 659 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

U.S. v. Hairston

Case Details

Full title:UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Arthur Lee HAIRSTON, Sr.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jan 20, 2011

Citations

408 F. App'x 659 (4th Cir. 2011)